Monday, October 9, 2017

The Human Stain: Why the Harvey Weinstein Story Is Worse Than You Think | The Weekly Standard

Which brings us, finally, to the other reason the Weinstein story came out now: Because the court over which Bill Clinton once presided, a court in which Weinstein was one part jester, one part exchequer, and one part executioner, no longer exists.

A thought experiment: Would the Weinstein story have been published if Hillary Clinton had won the presidency? No, and not because he is a big Democratic fundraiser. It’s because if the story was published during the course of a Hillary Clinton presidency, it wouldn’t have really been about Harvey Weinstein. Harvey would have been seen as a proxy for the president’s husband and it would have embarrassed the president, the first female president.

Bill Clinton offered get-out-of-jail-free cards to a whole army of sleazeballs, from Jeffrey Epstein to Harvey Weinstein to the foreign donors to the Clinton Global Initiative. The deal was simple: Pay up, genuflect, and get on with your existence. It was like a papacy selling indulgences, at the same time that everyone knew that the cardinals were up to no good. The 2016 election demolished Clinton world once and for all, to be replaced by the cult of Obama, an austere sect designated by their tailored hair shirts with Nehru collars. “That is not who we are as Americans,” they chant, as Harvey Weinstein’s ashes are scattered in the wind.

via www.weeklystandard.com

This is really good.

https://rightcoast.typepad.com/rightcoast/2017/10/the-human-stain-why-the-harvey-weinstein-story-is-worse-than-you-think-the-weekly-standard-1.html

| Permalink

Comments

Weinstein may be an entirely loathsome creature, but does even he deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as Slick Willie and Hellary?

Posted by: dearieme | Oct 9, 2017 4:11:02 PM

Still: Slick Willie, Stain - wot larks!

Posted by: dearieme | Oct 9, 2017 4:11:45 PM