Tuesday, April 26, 2022

Elon Musk's buying Twitter is good for free speech. And a 'nightmare' for progressives.

Academics have increasingly echoed the call for such censorship. Harvard law professor Jack Goldsmith and University of Arizona law professor Andrew Keane Woods have called for Chinese-style censorship of the internet, stating in The Atlantic that “in the great debate of the past two decades about freedom versus control of the network, China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong.”

This is dangerous: Ron DeSantis doesn't understand how civil liberties should work

A glimpse of that future was made clear by Twitter last week, when the company declared that it would ban any ads disagreeing with its view of climate change. Previously, Democratic senators demanded that Twitter expand censorship to include blocking disinformation on climate change as well as an array of other areas.

The push to pass the DSA brings many U.S. politicians full circle but also exposes the true motivation of what is euphemistically called "content modification." Democrats turned to corporate allies to impose censorship programs that they could not impose directly under the First Amendment.

Now that Musk's purchase of Twitter could blow apart that unified corporate alliance, they are seeking to use the EU to reimpose censorship obligations. Again, such restrictions would not trigger the First Amendment because they are being imposed by foreign governments.

The result would be a delicious victory for the anti-free speech movement. Musk may buy Twitter only to find himself forced to curtail free speech against the wishes of his customers and his new company.

via www.msn.com

Read the whole thing. I don't recognize this world or this country. I thought all of us agreed on the First Amendment, but I guess not.

https://rightcoast.typepad.com/rightcoast/2022/04/elon-musks-buying-twitter-is-good-for-free-speech-and-a-nightmare-for-progressives.html

| Permalink

Comments