Sunday, November 21, 2021

Modern Monetary Theory Isn’t the Future. It’s Here Now. - WSJ

The infrastructure act signed into law last week marked a defeat for the faction of progressive economists in ascendancy in 2020. For these advocates of modern monetary theory, the insistence by both political parties that all the $550 billion of new spending be matched by offsetting revenue, known as “payfors,” goes against their belief that money is merely a tool for government.

This is a temporary rhetorical setback. The reality is that MMT’s ideas have insinuated themselves deep into government, central banking and even Wall Street—and the infrastructure act is in fact deficit-financed anyway.

MMTers detest payfors as wrongheaded thinking about money. Money only exists because of government spending, and under MMT, the government should just create as much as it needs to finance its projects. In a tight economy—like we have now—MMT might want offsets to new spending. But higher taxes or lower spending elsewhere would be aimed at avoiding inflation, not at balancing the budget.

The government hasn’t embraced MMT. But important elements of it are now accepted by much of the economic and financial establishment, with major implications for how the economy is run.


There are some smart people on the interwebs who sorta support MMT. And this is not my area beyond my taking an avid amateur interest of one of the dogs in this experiment. That said, MMT strikes me as the high road to hyperinflation. I'm keeping a close eye on this and not holding any cash, not that I have that much to worry about.

| Permalink


I suspect that MMT would be a hard sell in Germany.

Posted by: dearieme | Nov 21, 2021 2:04:31 PM

I know: its opponents should call it WMT. Weimar Monetary Theory.

Posted by: dearieme | Nov 21, 2021 2:05:18 PM

Post a comment