Monday, April 5, 2021

Opinion | What Has the Pro-Life Movement Won? - The New York Times

The pro-life movement’s multidecade strategy, up to and including its fraught bargain with Donald Trump, appears to have succeeded. Thanks to the Trump White House and Mitch McConnell’s Senate, there is now a 6-to-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court, vetted by conservative legal activists and committed to principles of constitutional interpretation that seem to require sweeping Roe v. Wade away, or at least modifying it into obsolescence.

Yet instead of preparing to claim victory, in the last two weeks part of the anti-abortion movement has fallen into an acrimonious debate over a radical proposal — from the Australian philosopher and Notre Dame professor John Finnis, in the journal First Things, arguing that unborn human beings deserve protections under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

The political implication of Finnis’s argument is that the pro-life movement’s longtime legal goal, overturning Roe and letting states legislate against abortion, is woefully insufficient, and in fact pro-life activists should be demanding that the Supreme Court declare a fetal right to life.


Continue reading the main story

Finnis is not the first person to make that case, but the controversy it’s incited this time has been more intense, and in one sense strangely timed: An apparent hour of victory seems like an odd moment to fall to Twitter wrangling over a constitutional claim that most conservative jurists, from Robert Bork to Antonin Scalia, have consistently rejected.


| Permalink


I am intrinsically suspicious of all rhetoric using the verb "deserve".

As a practical matter, isn't it widely assumed that it's terribly hard to get a constitutional amendment passed?

Only God knows our just deserts and he doesn't exist.

Posted by: dearieme | Apr 6, 2021 5:10:50 AM

Every living human being has the right to life. Every living human being started as an embryo, later a fetus, later a newborn. There was no biological moment when they were not human beings. They had, have, and retain a right to life at every moment. What part of that have any of the discretionary killers ever refuted?

Posted by: R. Stevens | Apr 6, 2021 7:24:18 AM

It was reported by the new york slimes, so its probably incorrect, a lie or worse.

Posted by: Stu Buchalter | Apr 6, 2021 8:01:13 AM