Wednesday, June 1, 2016

Did Hillary’s Campaign Have to Be This Hard? -- NYMag

Leaning in toward Wheeler as if they are colleagues mapping out a strategy, Clinton speaks in a voice that is low and serious. “We have to be as organized and focused as they are to beat them and undermine them,” she says. “We are going to be relentless and determined and focused … They are experts at scaring people, telling them, ‘They’re going to take your guns’ … We need the same level of intensity. Intensity is more important than numbers.” Clinton tells Wheeler that she has already discussed gun control with Chuck Schumer, who will likely be leading the Senate Democrats in 2017; she talks about the differences between state and federal law and between regulatory and legislative fixes, and describes the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller, which extended the protections of the Second Amendment, as “a terrible decision.” She is practically swelling, Hulk-like, with her desire to describe to this family how she’s going to solve the problem of gun violence, even though it is clear that their real problem — the absence of their middle child — is unsolvable. When Matty grabs the front of his diaper, Clinton laughs, suggesting that he either needs a change or is pretending to be a baseball player. She is warm, present, engaged, but not sappy. For Clinton, the highest act of emotional respect is perhaps to find something to do, not just something to say. “I’m going to do everything I can,” she tells Wheeler. “Everything I can.”

via nymag.com

Sounds like she wants to take your guns, alright.

https://rightcoast.typepad.com/rightcoast/2016/06/did-hillarys-campaign-have-to-be-this-hard-nymag.html

| Permalink

Comments

But not, of course, the guns of the endless supply of armed men who protect her.

Tell me, Mr Smith, if guns cause murder, wouldn't people like Hillary eschew the armed bodyguards?

Posted by: dearieme | Jun 1, 2016 11:43:32 AM