The Right Coast

Editor: Thomas A. Smith
University of San Diego
School of Law

Thursday, November 27, 2014

Officer Wilson had a powerful case for self-defense under Missouri law [updated with thoughts on assessing a suspect's testimony before the grand jury] - The Washington Post

Officer Darren Wilson’s testimony before the Michael Brown grand jury developed a very strong case that he acted in self-defense under Missouri law. Wilson testified clearly that Brown was the “first aggressor” and that Wilson had a reasonable fear for his safety when he fired the fatal shot. Indeed, under Missouri law, the state would have had the burden at trial of disproving Wilson’s version beyond a reasonable doubt.  As a result, unless there was significant evidence that Officer Wilson’s testimony was false (a point I plan to address in a future post), the grand jury got it absolutely right in declining to return an indictment.

via www.washingtonpost.com

https://rightcoast.typepad.com/rightcoast/2014/11/officer-wilson-had-a-powerful-case-for-self-defense-under-missouri-law-updated-with-thoughts-on-assessing-a-suspects-testim.html

| Permalink

Comments

I'm somewhat puzzled that the whole brouhaha didn't die down when the footage emerged of the thug robbing the store and roughing up the clerk. Why try and make a martyr out of violent criminal? Aren't there any better candidates available?

Posted by: dearieme | Nov 27, 2014 2:27:39 PM