The Right Coast

Editor: Thomas A. Smith
University of San Diego
School of Law

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Child pornography restitution and the Violence Against Women Act: The Supreme Court considers how much restitution Doyle Paroline should have to pay.

In January, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Doyle Randall Paroline, who was caught with two pictures of Amy among 280 illegal images and was found liable by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit for the full amount of the restitution Amy, who is now 24, has claimed. The 5th Circuit said it was up to Paroline—not Amy—to find the other men who could also be on the hook for restitution and go after them for contributions. The legal theory is called joint and several liability. It’s the way courts deal with pollution cases in which a bunch of defendants all dump toxic waste into a single lake. A plaintiff sues one wealthy company for all the damages, and then that defendant has to sue other companies to share the costs.

Is this how Congress intended victims to recover from sex offenders when it passed VAWA in 1994?

via www.slate.com

h/t PC.

https://rightcoast.typepad.com/rightcoast/2013/12/child-pornography-restitution-and-the-violence-against-women-act-the-supreme-court-considers-how-much-restitution-doyle-paro.html

| Permalink

Comments