Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Looking at the CRU code
Tom Smith

Over at JamulBlog.  

I'm not a software engineer or climatologist but I'm guessing comments like "fudge factor" and "ARTIFICAL CORRECTION" might suggest the data is being, well, fudged.  Read the whole thing and the posts around it too.

To restate the obvious, the data and the code have to be available to the public so they can be examined and critiqued or it's not science.  Or, if it is science, it's not the kind of science you want to base trillion dollar public policy on.  It's our money, isn't it?

https://rightcoast.typepad.com/rightcoast/2009/11/looking-at-the-cru-code-tom-smith-.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf6e253ef0120a6d8eb28970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Looking at the CRU code
Tom Smith
:

Comments

Apparently the people do not count anymore.

Posted by: athena | Nov 25, 2009 2:53:48 PM

Show me the code - where is it?

Posted by: Dave | Nov 27, 2009 1:14:23 PM

I was looking for this information, thanks for put in this easy way, I mean in a easy way to understand it jajaja, well until the next time, by the way, good observation about this.

Posted by: Generic Viagra | Apr 26, 2011 12:36:41 PM