Wednesday, November 28, 2007

A Medieval Scholar Reviews Beowulf
Mike Rappaport

He doesn't like it too much.  This paragraph summary is entirely predictable:

If artists were not allowed to revisit the great works of the past, we would not have Dante's Commedia, or Joyce's Ulysses, or, for that matter, John Gardner's Grendel. But surely we could hope for a more intelligent and respectful visitor than this one. Beowulf is the oldest epic in our mother tongue, something very valuable yet by accident of time made accessible only to arduous study. This is the reality that gave us the King James Bible, Chapman's Homer, and even Heaney's Beowulf. But if one sets out to compete with genius, one must be either be armed with genius oneself, or win absolution through a redeeming humility. For every person who will ever read Beowulf, a thousand will see this film. Any teacher must feel a sense of lost opportunity.

Yet, for me, the most entertaining part of the review was this aside: "In light-hearted mood, medieval scholars debated such questions as this: "If you are to be married to a mermaid, which half do you want to be fish?"  I must admit, I had never heard of this or even thought of it.  A good question, though!

https://rightcoast.typepad.com/rightcoast/2007/11/a-medieval-scho.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf6e253ef00e54f8fa9668833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Medieval Scholar Reviews Beowulf
Mike Rappaport
:

Comments

The left half.

Posted by: dearieme | Nov 28, 2007 1:03:50 PM

Such a good writing, or by I saw for the first time. I'm quite happy, you are a good writer

Posted by: Kobe Shoes | May 5, 2011 1:39:06 AM