The Right Coast

Editor: Thomas A. Smith
University of San Diego
School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, March 20, 2017

Hamburger on Gorsuch and the Admin state

I hate Chevron and always have. It is one of those non-legal legal decisions of which administrative law seemes to be full. This is Philip Hamburger the Wise in the NYT:

Even worse, Chevron establishes judicial bias. Judge Gorsuch has been silent on this problem. But where the government is a party to a case, Chevron requires judges to defer to the agency’s interpretation. This amounts to a precommitment to the government’s legal position. Chevron, in other words, forces judges to engage in systematic bias favoring one party — the most powerful of parties — in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s due process of law. Chevron deference is thus Chevron bias.

Of course, judges regularly defer to precedent, but that is deference to the judgment of another judge. It is quite another thing, and clearly unconstitutional, for them to defer to the judgment of one of the parties — indeed, to favor its legal position whenever it comes into court.

Chevron therefore cannot be reduced merely to the separation-of-powers concern — important as that is. Chevron bias also raises serious civil liberties issues, because each party has a constitutional right to an impartial judicial proceeding.

http://rightcoast.typepad.com/rightcoast/2017/03/hamburger-on-gorsuch-and-the-admin-state.html

| Permalink

Comments

I suppose that's just another reason why many international companies don't trust your courts.

Posted by: dearieme | Mar 20, 2017 1:49:24 PM

Post a comment