Change is Good
« Tony prep school scandal update Tom Smith |
| YLS library therapy dog update Tom Smith »
Their uh, unusual marital history is a big liability. Maybe it shouldn't be but it is. Too bad too, as he's the closest thing to a candidate I could get enthused about.
Tom Smith on May 13, 2011 at 11:28 AM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf6e253ef015432491f0a970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mitch and Cheri Daniels Tom Smith:
In a nation of serial divorcers he'll be handicapped by remarrying her? Goodness me.
May 13, 2011 at 01:43 PM
I'm sorry but I don't see why the liability is so big. Is there something people are reading between the lines that I'm missing (domestic violence? his infidelity? lack of birth certificate)? Is the underlying assumption that his flaws drove her away?
Assuming that the changes in sentiment (both directions) were by Mrs. Daniels, one MIGHT hold that against her. But returning and making it work seems to speak well of both of them.
Tom Westberg |
May 13, 2011 at 05:21 PM
I don't hold it against them. I just think it gives a hostile MSM a lot to work with. Plus, she may not be up to the job.
Tom Smith |
May 15, 2011 at 11:56 AM
Thank you so much ,i am feeling so nice after reading your article!
Nike Free |
July 11, 2011 at 08:42 PM
i come here first time. You can share some of your article, I'm like you write something, really very good! I will continue to focus on
Retro Jordan 2011 |
August 09, 2011 at 08:25 PM
Nice article, great!I like it, thanks for sharing it with us. its worth reading!
Jordan Heels |
August 10, 2011 at 12:52 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.