Mike Ramsey has a third post on the unconstitutionality of the US military action in Lybia.
« The rose of the desert Tom Smith | Main | John Yoo on the Constitution and WarMike Rappaport »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf6e253ef014e8709300c970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Unconstitutionality of the Libyan Military Action: Part III
Mike Rappaport
:
The comments to this entry are closed.
I'll repeat a question I posted at Volokh. Is there any evidence from the International Man of Mystery's tenure as President that he trained as a lawyer?
Posted by: dearieme | March 29, 2011 at 03:04 AM
Obama's positions are generally supported by a variety of lawyers. But they are not usually consistent with what he said on the campaign trail. So he is acting like a very inconsistent politician.
Posted by: Mike Rappaport | March 29, 2011 at 10:14 PM
"Obama's positions are generally supported by a variety of lawyers." Fair enough; but for all I know the same might have been true of W who certainly didn't train as a lawyer. Is there anything that O has done , or said, or left undone, that cries "lawyer"?
Posted by: dearieme | March 30, 2011 at 02:04 AM
I don't think so.
Posted by: Mike Rappaport | March 30, 2011 at 10:57 AM
Obama is impressively trained in the rhetoric of the Marxist dialectic--which might pass for lawyerly--and he is a scholar of the Living Constitution. The evidence of his work at Harvard Law is buried with the SAT and LSAT under Grants Tomb along with the evidence of his attendance at Columbia, and his hash pipe.
Did you Britisher blokes forget to write down your Constitution or did you just figure it wouldn't make any difference?
Posted by: james wilson | March 31, 2011 at 10:07 AM
Life is a horse, and either you ride it or it rides you.
Posted by: Asics Shoes | July 23, 2011 at 12:30 AM
Better lose a jest than a friend
q1
Posted by: Nike Air Max | July 23, 2011 at 12:36 AM