It is based on four principles:
- Number one: let families and businesses buy health insurance across state lines.
- Number two: allow individuals, small businesses, and trade associations to pool together and acquire health insurance at lower prices, the same way large corporations and labor unions do.
- Number three: give states the tools to create their own innovative reforms that lower health care costs.
- Number four: end junk lawsuits that contribute to higher health care costs by increasing the number of tests and procedures that physicians sometimes order not because they think it's good medicine, but because they are afraid of being sued.
Sounds pretty good to me, and absolutely perfect as compared to the Democratic plans.

thanks for posting this
Posted by: athena | November 02, 2009 at 06:11 AM
It misses several important principles:
1. Force all healthcare providers to standardize prices for all drugs and all procedures and to publish them on the web, just as Sears and Walmart do.
2. Tax healthcare benefits.
3. Elimate government certification of all drugs, devices and procedures and kill healthcare provider licensing, as Milton Friedman long ago recommended.
4. Encourage patients to seek treatment in other countries, like Mexico, Thailand and Brazil, where it may be much cheaper.
Posted by: jimbino | November 02, 2009 at 08:03 AM
Good addition to the first four principles Jimbino. And I 100% agree with ending the junk lawsuits.
Posted by: obagi | November 02, 2009 at 09:51 AM
How about eliminating all the mandates as well?
Posted by: Joe Gator | November 02, 2009 at 12:11 PM
I don't want my doctor to order tests because he's afraid of getting sued, I want him to order tests because he's afraid of having me die on him when it could nave been prevented. If it takes having him be afraid of getting sued to do it, I can live with that.
Posted by: Lou Gots | November 02, 2009 at 12:45 PM
And who exactly will individuals pool with to purchase insurance at a discount?
Posted by: chris | November 02, 2009 at 01:44 PM
Individuals don't need to pool for auto insurance, and there are many discounted firms out there.
Posted by: Greg Saybolt | November 02, 2009 at 06:26 PM
At first we will have plenty of competition. But it will only be a few years before the biggest insurance companies start merge across state lines buying up smaller competitors. The competition pool will shrink and the companies will be large enough at that point to easily deny coverage, raise rates, change plans, and leave you hanging. After all, they have the one thing on their side you don't when you need insurance the most, "time". Fortunately (for the insurance companies), they will have taken care of any lawsuits on your behalf as well. Thanks, Repubs!
Posted by: WP | November 02, 2009 at 08:32 PM
If people had to pay some kind of co-pay like 20% for each test, then they wouldn't be demanding every possible test when most of them don't do much good. Free unlimited healthcare is what is costing so much.
Posted by: Mark | November 03, 2009 at 07:42 AM
So many tests are done for the following reason: Hospitals and doctros have to complete with one antoehr; in order to attract patients they need to have the newest equipment, tests, and all that stuff; once the providers buy (more likely lease) those fancy machines, tests, etc., they need to pay for them; the best to pay for the machines and latest tests and stay competitive is to make sure that as many patients as possible are getting them. I dont think it has to do with lawsuits, I think it has to do with justifying expenses.
Posted by: Johnny | November 03, 2009 at 11:04 AM