Right Coasters

Guest Bloggers

Notable Posts

The Old Right Coast

« Liberal Catholic delusion
Tom Smith
| Main | Holder's hidden agenda
Tom Smith
»

November 12, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf6e253ef0120a6922dbe970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Owned
Tom Smith
:

Comments

Thomas

It'd be more impressive if it happened to someone other than Hamilton. She writes a lot, and almost all of it is this bad.

john knox

I'll do you one better Tom. Check out Doug Laycock's review of her book. Amazing she still shows her face in public after such a smackdown. I'd crawl in a hole and hope nobody found me.

http://www.michiganlawreview.org/assets/pdfs/105/6/laycock.pdf

john knox

I should add that I found the review absolutely delicious. Couldn't happen to a nicer er more obnoxious person.

Randy

Knox - oh my. I really wasn't prepared for that - it was brutal. Starting with the title "A Syllabus of Errors" it goes downhill to this conclusion:

"This book is unworthy of the Cambridge University Press and the
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law."

john knox

Randy, If it weren't Marci Hamilton and her noxious opinions on the receiving end I would have had the same feeling reading that review that I do when watching a UFC fight where some poor chap gets his arm snapped in half. You think did that really just happen. That's really got to hurt. You sort of want to look away or put your hand over your eyes but still peek between your fingers to see how bad it is.

Skeptical

Thank you to john knox for the pointer to the Laycock review. I am a connoisseur of devastating book reviews — the ones where the reviewer doesn't just snipe or mock but just takes a book down bit by bit until there is nothing left. That's about as good as it gets. Academics are way too polite in book reviews, and it's nice to see telling the truth win out over being nice.

john knox

Skeptical, I aim to please. To complete the meal you ought to check her response to Laycock and his response to his response. Call it desert. Section III of his response cuts right to the misdirection of her rejoinder. She should have left well enough alone instead of ducking for cover under "guidelines for civility."

http://www.michiganlawreview.org/assets/pdfs/105/6/hamilton.pdf

http://www.churchstatelaw.com/treatises/GodvstheGavelbyDouglasLaycock.pdf

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment