Change is Good
« A little fairness would be stimulating Tom Smith |
| Men are from the simple planet, women from the complicated planet Tom Smith »
Tom Smith on January 23, 2009 at 09:56 AM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf6e253ef010536f155bc970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Atlas Shrugged wasn't fiction Tom Smith :
I'm sorry, Tom, that you found Atlas Shrugged to be a bad novel, because it's one of my favorites in terms of both content and literary style. I think Rand writes very much along the lines of the 19th-century romanticist tradition, such as Hugo and Dumas. Even if you dislike her literary style, though, I hope you still agree that it's better than the turgid nonsense of the stuff that passes as "literature" today, such as James Joyce.
January 23, 2009 at 10:13 AM
I've read Hugo and Dumas and Raynd is no Hugo or Dumas. I read The Fountainhead and set Atlas Shrugged down when I realized that getting the time I was wasting with it back was simply impossible. I never had that feeling with Hugo or Dumas.
January 23, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Atlas Shrugged would have been fine if it didn't take forever to read. Listen, we got the point Rand, how about getting to the climax already. Rand tends to repeat her point so much that it becomes less and less stimulating as the book continues.
January 23, 2009 at 11:29 AM
'Atlas Shrugged' was prophecy.
'The Fountainhead' was boring.
'We, the Living' was powerful.
January 23, 2009 at 02:03 PM
It's not so bad if you skip a bunch of the speeches. National Review’s review of the book as literature was spot on. It does today read more and more like prophecy. I almost asked “Who is John Galt”, when CNN was playing at the sandwich shop.
January 23, 2009 at 02:03 PM
I greatly enjoyed Rand's novels, though they are almost a genre to themselves. There aren't many novels that so explicitly and exhaustively make a theme of philosophy. More readable than Melville, anyway.
Ugh. I'd prefer that Atlas Shrugged were less relevant to Bailout World.
The good news is that the public (so far) isn't thrilled with this process, and will realize how much of the 'stimulus' is simply derived from the pork barrel wish lists that have been sitting around in Congressional desk drawers for many a year.
January 23, 2009 at 02:05 PM
Atlas Shrugs feels didactic is becasue its main plotline, the one one which the entire action is built is given away in blurb or the ads. If you do not know that and are simply reading, it's one of the most suspenseful and thrilling reads there ever was.
January 23, 2009 at 02:12 PM
I have a pen pal in Germany who I just advised to read Atlas Shrugged (called "Wer ist John Galt"). I hope she does, being the good little Socialist she is.
swift boater |
January 23, 2009 at 02:21 PM
I'm afraid Rand underestimated the problem. Where are the rational men today with whom one could gladly resort to a Galt's Gulch? Whom can you trust when a totally inexperienced communist racist has just been elected President and has an 80% approval rating? Where is our John Galt?
Robert Speirs |
January 23, 2009 at 02:32 PM
Have you been following current events? Alan Greenspan, one of Rand's closest disciples and one of the main guys responsible for the financial crisis, just went in front of Congress and basically said his underlying philosophy-- i.e., the one in *Atlas Shrugged*-- was wrong. You got your thesis exactly backwards, Greenspan tried to follow John Galt's advice and that got us... nationalized banks.
January 23, 2009 at 02:34 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.